- Purpose of Tenure
The main purposes of tenure are to recognize the performance of faculty members
who have given years of dedicated service to the university, to protect academic
freedom, and to enable the university to retain a permanent faculty of distinction
in order to accomplish its mission. For these reasons, tenure is awarded only after
a suitable probationary period, and the decision to award tenure is based both on
the merit of the individual faculty member and on the long-term needs and mission
of the department, the college, and the university.
- Eligibility for Tenure
Only faculty members who hold the ranks of assistant professor, associate professor,
or full professor are eligible to be considered for tenure. Assistant professors will be
awarded tenure only if they are simultaneously being promoted to the rank of associate professor.
Under certain circumstances administrative faculty holding rank in a department at the assistant
professor (if promotion to the rank of associate professor is being simultaneously considered), associate
professor, or full professor level may be considered for tenure, as specified by the Board of Visitors
policy concerning administrative faculty.
Since tenure is granted as a faculty member in an academic department or program, the award of
tenure does not imply continuance in any full-time or part-time administrative position, nor does it
imply continuance of any specific work assignment within or outside the department in which tenure
- The probationary period begins with the initial full-time, tenure-track appointment at Old Dominion
University at the rank of instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, or full professor;
only time spent in a tenure-track position at one of these ranks is counted as part of the probationary period.
Subject to agreement by the university and the faculty member, any academic year in which the faculty member
was on a full-time tenure-track appointment in one of these ranks for at least one semester may be counted as
one year of the probationary period.
- The following do not count as part of the probationary period:
Time in the rank of assistant instructor, artist-in-residence, performer-in-residence, writer-in-residence,
research professor, research associate professor, research assistant professor, research associate, or any
Time in appointment as an administrator, that is, in a position designated as a teaching/research
administrative position or as a classified position in the state personnel system. (Time spent in a
teaching and research faculty position as defined in the state personnel system will count as part of
the probationary period, even if administrative responsibilities are assigned as part of that position;
normally, departmental administrative positions such as chair or assistant chair will thus count as
part of the probationary period.)
Time in a position that involves no teaching of credit courses, for example as a teacher of
children or a therapist in the Child Study Center or as a teacher of exclusively noncredit course work.
Time spent on leave of absence.
Time spent on faculty exchanges if the faculty member so chooses.
- A period of time, not to exceed one year, may be excluded from
the probationary period, upon the approval of the provost and vice
president for academic affairs subject to the following conditions.
That the faculty member submits a request in writing to the department chair. The department chair and the dean shall forward the request with a recommendation to the provost and vice president for academic affairs.
The request must be the result of the occurrence of a serious event. A "serious event" is defined as a life-altering situation which requires the faculty member to devote more than eight hours of each day to alleviate the impact of the event for a period greater than six weeks and less than one year. These events may include the birth of a child, adoption of a child under the age of six years, serious personal illness or care of an immediate family member including parent, stepparent, child, or spouse.
The faculty member shall provide documentation to justify the time requested and the seriousness of the event.
The request shall be made no later than one year from the first day of the serious event.
The faculty member must have been adequately performing the duties assigned prior to the first day of the serious event.
Faculty who are awarded this exclusion shall have no requirements or expectations beyond those of any probationary faculty member.
Work accomplished during the excluded period may be cited in the tenure case.
Requests for exclusion may be made at any time during each academic year. No request shall be made after the application for tenure has been submitted.
Decisions will be made within 60 days of the receipt of the faculty member's request by the department chair.
The decision of the provost and vice president for academic affairs is final.
The maximum length of the probationary period is seven academic years.
The faculty member is informed of the decision of the provost and vice president
for academic affairs on tenure by April 15 of the sixth year of probationary
service. The faculty member will receive either a tenure contract or a terminal
contract in the seventh year.
- The length of the probationary period may be reduced in any of the
A faculty member who has full-time teaching experience at the rank
of instructor or above at another collegiate institution; or has had
full-time teaching experience in a nontenure-track position at Old Dominion
University; or who has had full-time teaching experience at the rank of
instructor or above at Old Dominion University prior to a break in service,
may have the probationary period reduced by one or two years. If the
probationary period is to be reduced, the reduction must be recommended by
the chair and dean and approved by the provost and vice president for
academic affairs at the time of the initial appointment. Unless such a
reduction has been approved and the faculty member has been so notified
in writing at the time of the initial appointment, reduction for prior
service will not be granted. The changes in the provisions of this paragraph
as compared to the Faculty Handbook of 1978-79 will not apply to faculty members
whose initial contract was offered prior to June 15, 1980.
A faculty member initially appointed to the rank of full professor may be notified
of a tenure decision by April 15 of the second year of service; if tenure is awarded, a
tenure contract will be offered for the third year of service. In addition, the
probationary period for a full professor may be eliminated, and an initial tenure
appointment may be recommended to the board if such an appointment has been requested
by the chair, voted on by the departmental tenure committee, the college promotion and
tenure committee, the university promotion and tenure committee and approved in
writing by the dean, the provost and vice president for academic affairs, and the
president. It is the sense of the Board of Visitors that the procedure of eliminating
the probationary period for tenure should be rarely used.
A faculty member initially appointed to the rank of associate professor may be notified
of a tenure decision by April 15 of the fourth year of service. If tenure is approved, a
tenure contract will be offered for the fifth year. In addition, the probationary period
for an associate professor may be eliminated, and an initial tenure appointment may be
recommended to the board if such an appointment has been requested by the chair, voted
on by the departmental tenure committee, the college promotion and tenure committee, the
university promotion and tenure committee and approved in writing by the dean, the provost
and vice president for academic affairs, and the president. It is the sense of the Board
of Visitors that the procedure of eliminating the probationary period for tenure should
be rarely used.
The probationary period for tenure may be shortened in the case of exceptional merit
and performance. It is the sense of the Board of Visitors that this procedure be followed
only in the case of demonstrably exceptional faculty members.
- Criteria for the Award of Tenure
The following criteria are used in the evaluation of every candidate for tenure.
Each faculty committee and administrator considering a tenure case must specifically
address each of these criteria as they apply to that case in the written recommendations
that are submitted up the line to the provost and vice president for academic affairs.
Committee votes must be recorded in the recommendations. In cases in which a vote is
not unanimous, reasons for negative votes must be included.
- Criteria to be used are as follows:
Since tenure may be awarded only to faculty members who hold the rank of associate or full professor or who are being simultaneously appointed to one of those ranks, any faculty member awarded tenure must meet the minimum requirements for the rank of associate professor.
- Merit - Merit of the faculty member in teaching, research,
and service over the entire probationary period and the contributions
made by the faculty member in these areas to the university.
(For definition of teaching, research, and service and a discussion
of methods of evaluation, see policies and procedures concerning
evaluation of faculty members, below.) In addition to information
supplied by faculty information sheets, the chair's evaluation,
and other material presented by the department, an opportunity
shall be made available for the faculty member to provide in writing
any other material in support of the tenure candidacy.
It is the responsibility of the department chair and the departmental promotion and tenure committee to provide an assessment of the quality of the publications for the faculty being considered for tenure. The evidence should address the quality of the journals and the reputation of book and other such publishers.
External evaluation of the quality of the faculty member's
research performance will be required from nationally recognized
experts in the faculty member's field. Candidates for tenure should provide a statement of potential external and/or internal reviewers with whom there is a conflict of interest, e.g., co-authors, co-investigators, etc. In case of material developments, additional documentation may be added to the portfolio with the concurrence of the department chair and dean.
A curriculum vitae will be required of each external reviewer.
Each reviewer will be asked to describe any personal or professional
relationship with the candidate. It is the responsibility of the chair
to include a curriculum vitae of each reviewer. For tenure of department chairs, the responsibility belongs to the dean.
External reviewers will be asked to evaluate all submitted material mailed
to them. In the case of the arts, reviewers may be asked to consider works of
art or performances. External reviewers will be asked to evaluate: a) the
quality of the scholarship or creative work under review; and b) the scholarly
reputation (regional, national, international) of the candidate.
All candidates for tenure will be required to have their scholarship
evaluated by no fewer than four external reviewers. If fewer than four reviews are
received, the chair will choose additional reviewers alternately from the lists of the
department promotion and tenure committee and of the candidate.
- The determined long-term needs of the department, college, and university,
including at least the following:
The long-term enrollment of the department.
The need for an additional specialist in the faculty member's area of specialization
as a permanent member of the department in terms of the mission of the department,
the college, and the university.
The tenure structure of the department. (Although no maximum percentage of faculty
members on tenure is established, all committees and administrators considering tenure
must take into account the need for flexibility in course offerings and the desirability
of a tenure structure that will allow openings for new tenured faculty members in the
ensuing decades so that new areas of specialization and new needs can be met. The
position of other nontenured faculty members in the department, anticipated
retirements, or other known departures, and projected new programs or changes in directions must be considered.)
No person can be awarded tenure unless convincing evidence is provided
of effective teaching.
In departments offering graduate work, no faculty member can normally be awarded tenure
unless convincing evidence is provided of successful performance in research. (Exceptions
can be made only if the department can demonstrate a long-term need for an additional tenured
faculty member who will not be teaching graduate students.)
- Procedure for Tenure Consideration
The provost and vice president for academic affairs, fifteen months prior to the date for giving notification of the tenure decision, shall formally advise the professor that the limit of the probationary period is approaching, and explain what procedures should be followed by those wishing to be considered for tenure.
- External review process
The responsibility for initiating the external review, securing the reviewers, and forwarding complete review files to the dean, provost and vice president for academic affairs, and the University Promotion and Tenure Committee belongs to the department chair.
External reviewers with academic positions will hold the same rank or higher than the promotion rank for which the faculty member is being considered; exceptions should be justified by the dean. The department tenure and promotion committee and the candidate will prepare separate lists of potential reviewers. The candidate will review both lists and will document personal and professional relationships with all potential reviewers. The chair will select three reviewers from the candidate's list and three reviewers from the department tenure and promotion committee's list; the chair will provide this list of reviewers to the dean. The dean will submit an agreed upon list to the provost and vice president for academic affairs for final approval prior to initiating the review process. As a general rule, external reviewers should not be co-authors or former mentors of the candidate. The selection of potential external reviewers must be completed before the end of the semester prior to the submission of credentials for tenure.
External reviews will be confidential; reviewers will be so advised. Requests for exception to the confidentiality of external reviews should be made directly to the provost and vice president for academic affairs before the reviewers are asked to submit evaluations. If an exception is approved, candidates for tenure will be allowed access to the substance of external reviews, but the authorship of specific external reviews and other identifying information contained therein will remain confidential. All external reviewers will receive a standard letter sent by the chair but prepared by the provost and vice president for academic affairs in consultation with the deans and a copy of the policy on external reviews so their responsibilities will be clear.
The university and college administration will assist departments where reasonable expenses are necessary to obtain appropriate external reviews.
- Initial consideration of tenure cases is conducted by the tenured faculty
of the department.
The tenured faculty of a department may determine that a tenure
committee of a specified size will be selected from their membership
to conduct the tenure deliberations and make recommendations to the
chair. In this case, the entire full-time department faculty will
elect the committee. It is the responsibility of this committee to
determine the opinions of tenured members of the department not
serving on the committee.
- In departments where fewer than three members are tenured, the dean, in consultation with the chair, will appoint enough additional tenured faculty members to form a committee of at least three.
No dean, associate dean, assistant dean, or other full-time administrator
or department chair shall attend or participate in the deliberations of the
departmental, college, or University Promotion and Tenure Committee, or of
the tenured faculty of the department serving as a group to consider tenure,
except in those cases when such committees or groups may, at their discretion,
request administrators or chairs to answer specific questions concerning tenure
The college committees shall consist of one tenured faculty member from each department in the college. All members of college promotion and tenure committees shall be elected directly by the faculties they represent for a one-year term renewable twice for a total of three years. This member shall be chosen by majority vote of all full-time, tenure-track teaching and research faculty members of the department, present and voting, by secret ballot before April 15 of each year for the ensuing year. There should be at least three professors on the college committee. No person shall serve on a college promotion and tenure committee for more than three years consecutively but is eligible for reelection after an absence of at least one year.
- The University Promotion and Tenure Committee shall consist of one tenured full professor from each of the major degree-granting academic colleges. This member shall be elected by his/her college's promotion and tenure committee(s) by September 15. The University Promotion and Tenure Committee shall elect one
of its members as chair. No person shall serve on the University Promotion and Tenure Committee for more than three years consecutively but is eligible for reelection after an absence of at least one year.
The committee or group of tenured faculty makes its recommendation to the chair.
All committee members should vote yes or no. Considering this recommendation, the chair makes an additional evaluation and
recommendation concerning tenure.
If either the tenured faculty (or their committee), or the chair, or both recommend
tenure, the credentials of the faculty member together with the recommendations of
the tenured faculty (or their committee) and the chair are forwarded to the tenure
committee of the college, which examines the facts and the recommendations and makes
a recommendation to the dean. All committee members should vote yes or no.
If neither the departmental committee nor the chair recommends tenure for the faculty member, tenure is not granted in the ensuing year. If the faculty member is being considered in the year preceding the limit of his or her probationary period, as defined by the Board of Visitors policy on tenure, that faculty member is given a terminal contract for the ensuing year unless a further review is requested.
If the faculty member requests further review, all materials including departmental and chair evaluations and recommendations are forwarded to the college tenure committee, which makes a separate recommendation to the dean. All committee members should vote yes or no. The dean then makes a decision concerning tenure and informs the faculty member.
If either the decision of the college committee or that of the dean is positive, the faculty member's case is considered in accordance with the procedures in the following paragraphs. If both decisions are negative, the faculty member may request a further review by the provost and vice president for academic affairs, who makes a final determination concerning further consideration of tenure.
The dean of the college examines the facts and all previous recommendations
and makes a recommendation concerning tenure, which is forwarded, with reasons,
to the provost and vice president for academic affairs.
The University Promotion and Tenure Committee, consisting of one tenured
full professor from each of the major degree-granting academic colleges,
examines the facts and all previous recommendations and documentation and
makes a recommendation (with reasons, including minority reasons, if any)
concerning tenure, which is forwarded to the provost and vice president for
The provost and vice president for academic affairs, after examining
all submitted documents and consulting with appropriate staff members,
makes a determination concerning tenure for the faculty member. If the
recommendations from all committees and administrators previously acting
on the case have not all been the same, or if the provost and vice president
for academic affairs disagrees with the recommendations that have been the same,
then the provost and vice president for academic affairs shall consult with the
University Promotion and Tenure Committee and with the chair and dean concerned.
If the determination of the provost and vice president for academic affairs
is in favor of tenure, the provost and vice president for academic affairs
forwards the faculty member's name to the president for presentation to the
Board of Visitors as a candidate for tenure. The Board of Visitors will
act on the case by April 30 of the year in which it is being taken up. Upon
approval of the Board of Visitors, the faculty member is offered a tenure
contract for the coming year.
If the determination of the provost and vice president for academic
affairs is against tenure and the decision is made in the year preceding
the end of the limit of the probationary period, the faculty member is
notified by April 30 that a terminal contract will be offered for the
ensuing year. A faculty member who has not reached the limit of the
probationary period may be offered either one subsequent annual contract
or a terminal contract for the ensuing year.
The faculty member may request by May 15 that the president review
a negative decision of the provost and vice president for academic affairs.
The president should make a decision on the review by June 15. If the president
upholds the decision of the provost and vice president for academic affairs,
the faculty member may request a further review by the Board of Visitors or its
designated committee by June 30. (Refer to the policy on Communications With the
Board of Visitors for procedural information.) The decision of the Board of Visitors
or its designated committee is final. The Board of Visitors will make its decision by
Copies of the recommendations by all committees, chairs, deans and the provost shall be provided to the faculty member being considered for tenure. The faculty member will be provided opportunity to correct any factual misinformation in such recommendations by placing a letter in his or her tenure file at any stage, or up until May 1 to the provost (February 1 for faculty hired mid-year).
- The above procedures at the departmental and college level may be suitably
adapted for faculty members who hold interdisciplinary or interdepartmental
appointments. The adapted procedures should be recommended by the promotion
and tenure committee of the college or colleges involved and approved by the
dean or deans and the provost and vice president for academic affairs. Procedures
above the college level will be the same as designated above in all cases.
- Adopted by the Board of Visitors
June 12, 1980
Revised February 24, 1984
Revised November 19, 1987
Revised December 13, 1988
Revised September 27, 1990
Revised April 9, 1998
Revised December 10, 1998
Revised April 12, 2002
Revised April 11, 2003
Revised June 14, 2005
Revised September 9, 2005
Revised September 22, 2006
Revised June 15, 2007
Revised December 7, 2007
Revised September 17, 2009
Revised April 8, 2010
Revised April 4, 2012
Revised June 14, 2012