 |
|
|
|
Evaluation of Academic DeansDeans are appointed without any term limit expectation or regularly scheduled
reappointment review. Deans are evaluated annually during the spring semester for improvement,
potential and merit consideration by the provost and vice president for academic
affairs. - The process of evaluation is the following:
The dean prepares and submits a report of college achievements and
personal professional growth to the provost and vice president for academic
affairs. College chairs submit performance appraisals of the dean of their
college to the provost and vice president for academic affairs. Input from all full-time faculty in the relevant college will be solicited
by the provost and vice president for academic affairs at least once
every three years through a survey form and an opportunity for written
comments. This information shall be returned directly to the provost
and vice president for academic affairs. A summary of the evaluation results will be distributed by the provost and vice president for academic affairs to the faculty in the college.
Criteria for the performance appraisal shall be both generic and specific.
Specific criteria relate to a particular administrative unit, e.g., Business
and Public Administration, Engineering and Technology, Health Sciences, and
will be defined by the unit. Generic criteria shall be common to all deans. The provost and vice president for academic affairs will inform the dean
of the appraisals and of the provost's response to the evaluation materials,
including constructive criticism. The evaluation results and the dean's reply (if any) will be retained
in confidence by the provost and vice president for academic affairs but
will be available to the president upon request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
