Old Dominion University
A to Z Index  |  Directories

Office of Academic Affairs

Faculty Handbook

 Search Handbook       

Evaluation of Scholarly Activity and Research

  1. Scholarly Activity and Research
    1. It is the responsibility of the chair to evaluate the quality of the scholarly activity and research of the faculty member (a mere listing of publications or grants does not constitute evaluation).

    2. Each department should establish, with the approval of the dean and the provost and vice president for academic affairs, a clear statement of the criteria for evaluating scholarly activity and research in that department. These criteria must include items 4 a-c at a minimum and items 4 d-j where appropriate. The criteria should take into consideration both the mission of the department and the nature of the scholarly activity and research within the discipline or related disciplines and in appropriate interdisciplinary venues. The department criteria should be attached to the evaluation by the chair that is submitted to the dean and to the provost and vice president for academic affairs.

    3. If the faculty member has received released time for research, the chair should evaluate the effectiveness with which this released time has been used.

    4. Within the definitions noted below, the evaluation of scholarly activity and research in a department should be based on these criteria. In evaluation, emphasis should be placed on quality, not just quantity. The following, where appropriate, are included in the definition of scholarly activity and research at Old Dominion University: publications, presentations at professional meetings, grants and contracts, computer software and educational media, instructional research, interdisciplinary research, creative and artistic productions, translational research including patents awarded, and applied projects in technical and professional fields.
      1. Publications - In evaluation, the chair should take into consideration and comment upon the reputation and editorship of journals in which the faculty member has published, the extent of external peer review of articles, level of authorship for the faculty member, e.g. sole, first, or second author, and the level of publications, e.g. international/national, regional, state, or local. Published books are evaluated on the level and reputation of the publishing company, e.g. international/national, regional, state, local, or self-published, and the nature of the reviews received. Evaluation of the quality of the publication is essential. For major personnel decisions (e.g., tenure and promotion) external evaluation of publications is required.

      2. Presentations at professional meetings - The chair will be expected to evaluate such presentations on a similar basis to publications in learned journals - that is, taking into consideration the extent of external peer review before acceptance of the paper and the prestige associated with having a paper accepted for presentation at that meeting.

      3. Grants and contracts - In evaluation of faculty members' funded research activity, the chair should take into consideration the aggressiveness with which the faculty members have sought out research opportunities (considering the availability of opportunities in their fields), the effectiveness with which faculty members have met the requirements established by the funding agency, the effectiveness with which the faculty members have worked with colleagues and contributed to funding for graduate assistants and post-doctoral fellows, purchased released funds obtained, and the leadership that faculty members have provided on particular grants (as principal investigator, co-principal investigator, collaborator, consultant or other major participant).

      4. Computer software and educational media - Creative work resulting in the creation of significant computer software or digital educational materials for use external to the University will be evaluated by the chair based on external evaluations and reviews.

      5. Instructional research - The chair should give credit to effective instructional research by faculty members, with emphasis on well-designed and controlled research in teaching, particularly in their own or closely related disciplines, and the recognition that the instructional research has received through publication or adoption at other institutions.

      6. Interdisciplinary research – Credit should be given for interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary research, including collaboration with others outside the immediate field of expertise of the faculty member, whether internal or external to the University.

      7. In fields such as music, performing arts, and art, performance and juried/curated exhibition are counted as research activity. The chair should evaluate the quality of the artistic production, and may consider evidence such as published reviews of performance and exhibitions, stature and exclusivity of venue and juror/curators, or awards in juried exhibitions.

      8. Translational research and patents awarded are important components of faculty research in certain health services, business and technical fields. The chair should give credit for patents awarded and translational research that results in important new industrial, health services, or business applications.

      9. Research activities may include applied projects that directly support the needs of industry, government and/or the community, and result in a comprehensive published technical report. Examples include publications in trade journals, economic impact studies and forecasts, white papers, reports to government agencies, etc. Further examples of other appropriate research and scholarly activities are development of new products, processes, or techniques and software development.

      10. Other – Editorship of prestigious journals may be considered scholarly activity in certain disciplines. Book reviews, instructional manuals, and articles in national popular magazines related to the faculty member’s expertise may be considered, but are not substantial scholarly publications.

 - Approved by the president
June 24, 2013

   Compare with: