syllabus
calendar
blackboard
student.email
resources
last.updated
6.19.11
|
|
Teaching
Grammar(s)
Purpose
As
Micciche reminds us, you can anticipate sitting on a plane with a stranger
who asks what you do for a living, and after you explain that you are
an English teacher, the person will inevitably respond, "I guess I better
watch my grammar." This situation demonstrates the public perception that
the teaching of English, especially writing, is conflated with the teaching
of grammara
perception that has roots in Current Traditional
Rhetoric pedagogy. But what exactly do we mean when we evoke the term
"grammar"? innate grammatical knowledge? grammatical etiquette?
stylistics? And what should weor better yet, can weteach in
the composition classroom? Today we will define grammar and discuss what can do, cannot do, and should do as writing instructors.
Before
Class
- Read
Hartwell, "Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar"
[College
English, 47.2]
- Read
Micciche, "Making a Case for Rhetorical Grammar" [BB]
- Read
Matsuda, "Let's Face It" [BB]
- Read
Troutman, "Whose Voice is it Anyway?" [BB]
- Submit Sample Assignment with rationale to the
instructor as a hard copy at the beginning of class
Activity:
Evaluating Student Writing
You will
be given a sample of student writing with the assignment. Each of you
will be given specific context about how you should perceive the piece
of writing.
- This
writing sample is a rough draft.
- This
writing sample is a final draft for the first paper of the semester.
- This
writing sample is a final draft for the last paper of the semester.
Consider
your assigned context and evaluate the paper accordingly. Then using the readings develop a teaching strategy that you will use to teach this student, and students like this student, how to revise their papers. You will have
thirty minutes. Be prepared to discuss the decisions you made and why
you made them.
Discussion:
What to do
The
discussion today
will address the following questions:
- How is
the way we address oral grammar different than how we address written
grammar?
- What
are the five grammars that Hartwell describes?
- Which
of the five grammars does Micciche's rhetorical grammar respond to?
- How does
issues of grammar correspond with the rhetorical appeals?
- Hartwell,
in 1985, argues that the grammar debate is over? What is your opinion?
Justify your response.
- Why are
non-standard productions of English a problem for the academy?
- What
is Matsuda's
argument? What is Troutman's argument? How are they approaching the
issue of language diversity similarly and differently?
- How do
the issues that Matsuda and Troutman describe speak to the discussion of teaching grammar rhetorically
(Miccichi) and the different definitions of grammar (Hartwell)?
- How
have you decided to address grammar in the writing course you designed?
How might Hartwell, Micciche, Matsuda and/or Troutman talk about your pedagogy?
- What
questions or comments do you have about these articles?
|
|