Grammar(s)
& Diversity

Purpose
Students
who grow up in environments where standard academic English is not used
and/or valued will often produce errors when
asked to produce this dialect of the academy. This fact often stigmatizes
these students and, in many cases (or as a result), challenges their academic
success. Whether we are faced with a full class of these students or just
one of these students, we should know how our pedagogy will address these
issues. And we may also ask how we handle error when it is consistent
and you only have 15 weeks to work with the students. By the end of the
class you will be able to decide what strategies you will use to invite
these students into the academic discourse community.

Before
Class
FreeWrite
Answer the
following questions in "Week 13" thread of the Blackboard
Discussion Board. You have the first ten minutes of class.
The
CCCC Statement on a Student's Right to Own Language states:
We affirm
the students' right to their own patterns and varieties of language-the
dialects of their nurture or whatever dialects in which they find their
own identity and style. Language scholars long ago denied that the myth
of a standard American dialect has any validity. The claim that any
one dialect is unacceptable amounts to an attempt of one social group
to exert its dominance over another. Such a claim leads to false advice
for speakers and writers' and immoral advice for humans. A nation proud
of its-diverse heritage and its cultural and racial variety will preserve
its heritage of dialects. We affirm strongly that teachers must have
the experiences and training that will enable them to respect diversity
and uphold the right of students to their own language.
How
does your current pedagogy or the pedagogy you proposed in your semester
syllabus help to fulfill the promises of the SRTOL Position statement
(see above) and the CCCC's
Statement on Second Language Writing and Writers?
Discussion:
Diverse Grammatical Structure
The
discussion today
will address the following questions:
- What
questions or comments do you have about these articles?
- Why are
non-standard productions of English a problem for the academy?
- What
is Ferris's argument? What is Troutman's argument? How are they approaching
the issue of language diversity similarly and differently?
- How do
the issues that Ferris and Troutman describe speak to the discussion
of teaching grammar rhetorically (Miccichi) and the different definitions
of grammar (Hartwell)?
- If we
decide to value Canagarjah's argument that we should legitimates our
students' World Englishes and encourage code-meshing in the composition
classroom, how might it influence how we approach the six student essays
in Troutman's article?
Activity:
Being Gateways
Get into
groups with others. Using the student essay that we examined two weeks
ago, develop a strategy for helping this student reduce error
in his writing. Write a justification for your approach based upon the
scholarship we have read. Be prepared to share your responses with the
class. This will not be submitted.

|