The
Grammar Debates
Purpose
L2 writing
is an issue unto itself mostly because L2 student writers rarely produce
native-like prose; instead their prose is often marked by various types
of grammatical errors. While we have already discussed the politics and
the theory surrounding the perceptions of L2 writing errors, today we
will address what to do. The discussion will focus on the ongoing debate
between Truscott and Ferris about whether teachers should correct L2 student
writers' errors.
Before
Class
Discussion:
L2 Writers & L2 Writing
We will
discuss the following:
- We will
define interlanguage fossilization and orthography
- What
questions do you have about the readings for today's class?
Students
will be divided into four groups. Each group will...
- be assigned
one of the four articles
- identify
the author's argument and the premises that support this argument
- assign
one person to write what the group has learned on the board
You have
twenty-five minutes, then we will continue to discuss the following:
- Using
your group work, we will discuss the evolution of the grammar debates
between Truscott and Ferris
- Where
do you position yourself in this debate?
- What
questions do you have about their discussion of research?
Activity:
Responding to Student Writing
Place yourself
in the position as an instructor of first-year writing or the language
arts. Despite your position on the grammar debates, the institution you
work for expects that students in your course will be capable of composing
mostly error-free prose. Each of you will be given the same piece of student
writing.
Respond
to this piece of writing keeping your position on Truscott and Ferris's
debate in mind. Then write a short explanation justifying why you responded
to this writing as you did. You will have 30 minutes; we will then discuss
your responses.
|