| syllabus
calendar
blackboard
student.email
resources
last.updated
3.20.13
|
|
The
New Technologies of Literacy

Purpose
The previously
limited repertoire of delivery methods–pen or pencil on paper, the
printed page, the typewritten page–has in recent decades become
ubiquitous and almost invisible to both writers and readers. Now writers
and readers with computer access can produce and receive texts delivered
in many different multimodal formats that alter our epistemological experiences.
Today we will discuss the pedagogical significance of writing technology's
latest iterations and how we might use these tools in the classroom.

Discussion
– Writing/Reading (with) Digital Technologies
The readings
for this week prompt us to think about the digital technology's influence
on writing and how that shapes our writing instruction. We will discuss
the following:
- What
questions, comments, or concerns do you have about these articles?
- What
are their respective arguments?
- Luke
wrote her chapter about a decade ago, how well does her argument hold
up after ten years of hindsight and the most recent technological advances?
- Both
Kress and Sheridan believe that literacy instructors need to expand
the semiotic repertoire that we allow students to use. How are their
arguments similar? different?
- If Sheridan,
Kress, Gee, Delpit, and LoBianco were having a conversation, what would
it look like? In other words, what connections are there between language
policy and the modalities we teach in literacy courses?
Activity
– Incorporating Technology into our Pedagogy
The English
Studies administration at Pedagogy U. wants to get some general education
dollars into their coffers by offering some English courses that will
fulfill the university's technology literacy requirement (vaguely defined
as the ability to use basic digital programs for composing, communicating,
and calculating), a lower division course. You are being appointed to
the various ad hoc sub-committees (see below) to develop a curriculum
for an English Studies course that also fulfills the general education
requirement for technology literacy.
| Committee |
Members |
| Teacher Preparation (1) |
April, Sarah S. & Sarah J. |
| Composition (2) |
Beth, Mae & Wil |
| Digital Writing (3) |
Matt, Susan & Amy |
Use Google
Documents to faciliate this meeting. It is recommended that
you use the first part of the meeting to discuss how you will use the
technology and what role each person will play. Ask your collective selves,
what are the outcomes for the class? and what will the students do to
arrive at the outcomes?
You have
an hour to produce a document that you will present to the department.

|
|