![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
course.goals
last.updated
|
instructor
kevin eric depew
calendar In this course we will examine how the field of rhetoric–for better or for worse–has shaped composition studies. Tracing the history of this field, since its inception at Harvard University in the nineteenth century to the present, we will study the rhetorical paradigms–and their social and ideological foundations–from which composition pedagogy has been designed and justified. We will also assess how the field is currently articulating the composition classroom (as well as how others are trying to articulate it, i.e., institutional rhetoric) and the rhetorics (visual rhetoric, digital rhetoric, rhetorics of race and gender) informing new pedagogical possibilities. In this course you will ...
recommended prerequisites English 664, English 720/820, English 760/860, or English 765/865
Other readings will be retrieved from... Teacher-for-a-Day (PhD: 50 points): Each of the PhD students will be responsible for developing discussion questions from and synopses of the assigned reading for one class period. Project Proposal (50 points): Early in the semester, you will draft a proposal outlining how you will fulfill the course requirements. Not only do you get the opportunity to see if the work you want to do is feasible, the proposal gives you the opportunities to focus your inquiries for the semester and receive guidance from the instructor. Progressive Annotated Bibliography (50 points): By reading above and beyond the assigned readings, you will have the opportunity to acquaint yourself with the fields of rhetoric and composition studies. For this assignment, you will find and annotate five academic articles about literacy instruction. Your research should be geared towards a problem or an assignment that you are interested in and informs the work you will do in the subsequent assignments. Conference Paper & Roundtable Presentation (PhD: 150 points; 50 points): You will be given the professional opportunity to practice preparing for a conference. Due to time constraints you will compose an eight-page conference length paper (~20 minutes), but you will present a 5 minute roundtable position statement from this paper. Use your peers' feedback and questions to develop your conference paper for the article assignment. Pedagogical Analysis (150 points): You will select an composition-oriented artifact (e.g., textbook, assignment, software) or experience (writing class, workshop) and explain the rhetorical and/or composition theories that inform its production. Article Manuscript (200 points): Develop your Conference Paper/Roundtable Presentation into an article length manuscript. Three Means of Failing the Course related to Major Assignments
Major Assignments I will be looking for evidence of each student's progress towards professional level work. More specifically I will be looking for evidence of...
Quizzes While there are no quizzes scheduled for this course, the instructor reserves the right to introduce them into the schedule if it becomes apparent that the course readings are not being done. Grade Scale Your final grade (500 points for MAs; 700 for PhDs) and assignments will be graded using the following point scale* :
*
= The instructor reserves the right to adjust this scale based on the
students' performance throughout the semester. Any adjustments will 1)
apply to the entire class and 2) never deny a student the grade that s/he
earns based upon this posted scale. Students are required to attend every class. If you miss a class, for whatever reason, you are responsible for making up any missed work.
Electronica refers to technology-related issues. E.mail
Accounts Because Blackboard's "Send Email" function "talks to" your ODU account, it is recommended that you work with this account. At the very least, you are required to forward your ODU mail to the account you use most. To get an ODU account go to OCCS. You are responsible for making sure that files and messages are successfully received by the instructor and your peers; other email providers cannot provide this security. Also you will want to be aware that some evaluated course work will be returned via email; if you are concerned about other parties reading these messages, please develop an account that is dedicated to just you (or come talk to the instructor). E.mailing
Protocol Also use the priority setting rhetorically; in other words, make your email message stand out when you really need to draw the recipient's attention to your message. Do not use the priority setting on your standard assignment submissions. Protecting
Your Work
Electronic
Ethics and Respect As per the University's Honor Code, you must do your own original work in this classand appropriately identify that portion of your work which is collaborative with others, or which is borrowed from others, or which is your own work from other contexts. Whenever you borrow graphics, quote passages, or use ideas from others, you are legally and/or ethically obliged to acknowledge that use, following appropriate conventions for documenting sources. In this class, the most serious form of academic dishonesty is to recycle another individual's major project under your own name. If you have doubts about whether or not you are using your own or others' writing ethically and legally, ask the instructor. Follow this primary principle: If in doubt, ask. Be up front and honest about what you are doing and about what you have contributed to an assignment. If you have a documented disability, make sure you register with Disability Services (757. 683.4655). Once you do so, feel free to talk to me about any special accommodations that you may need to fulfill the requirements of this course. At the end of the semester, you will have an opportunity to evaluate the instructor and the course. This is very important for helping the instructor and the department assess the course. Please take the time at the end of the semester to do these online evaluations. |