syllabus
calendar
blackboard
student.email
resources
last.updated
8.15.07
|
|
Conference
Paper, Roundtable, & Article
Purpose
Throughout
the semester I have talked about the conversations about rhetoric,
composition, and the combination of the two. By reading scholarship about
rhetoric and composition, you are listening to the conversation. This
series of assignments gives you the opportunity to participate in the
conversation in various ways–composing a conference paper, presenting
a roundtable position statement, and developing the conference paper into
an article.

Instructions–Epistemological
Process
Choose
a topic related to rhetoric and composition . In these submissions,
you are required to address 1) rhetorical studies, and 2) the teaching
of composition or professional writing (an acceptable alternative because
scholars and instructors in this discipline often use a rhetorical foundation;
other English Studies courses need to be approved by the instructor)
You may
ask yourself...
- what
does rhetoric say about X issue experienced in the teaching of writing?
- how
does X rhetorical issue translate into a literacy practice or pedagogical
strategy that facilitates writing?
You are
encouraged to work on local and immediate issues that you are trying
to work through in your professional contexts
Instructions–Writing
All
students will compose an article and present a five-minute roundtable
presentation; only PhD students will be required to write a conference
paper. The parameters for these three submissions are as follows...
Conference
Paper (PhD Students)
Most
conferences give panel speakers twenty minutes to present their work.
The rule of thumb is to compose an 8 page double-spaced paper. Due to
the oral nature of this genre's delivery, you will want to reference
scholarship more than you cite it, and you never read in-text citations.
Therefore, use this referenced scholarship to demonstrate the research
you have done for this paper. In this paper, you want to appear well
informed about the topic's conversation, but not necessarily an authority,
except on issues pertaining to your local context.
- 8
pages double-spaced or 4 pages singled-spaced
- due
October 16, 2007
at the end of class as an email attachment to the
instructor or a hard-copy.
- 150
points
Roundtable
Presentation
Another
presentation format at conferences is the roundtable in which several
participants (often four or more) give short position statements on
a topic with the intention of leaving time for Q & A or an open
forum on the topic. For this assignment, each of you will...
-
present a five-minute position statement based upon the work you are
doing for the article and/or conference paper. Because of the brevity
of this format, you will only have time to articulate your argument
and support it with a few select claims and evidentiary examples.
This will be two pages double-spaced; if you choose to use PowerPoint,
you should develop no more than five slides (one minute per slide).
You will be penalized for going over five minutes.
- additionally
compose a handout–no more than one-page double-sided–that
provides your audience with a 250 word abstract of your presentation
and a reference list (or works cited/referenced). You may also include
any other information that you think your audience needs (e.g., definitions,
quotes, diagrams) to better understand your point.
Post
the handout to the Blackboard
Discussion Board before class so that your peers can access it. Also
submit a hard-copy version to the instructor after the presentation.
Note that the handout is the only text the instructor is collecting
for the Roundtable Presentation.
- the
presentation will be no more than five-minutes
- the
handout will be no more one page double-sided and comply to document
design principles
- due
October 16, 2007
- 50
points
Article
Manuscript
Although
a lot of scholars will select material from scholarship they have written
for articles and chapters for conference presentations, other scholars
work in opposite direction and use conference papers as the springboard
for articles and chapters. By presenting scholarship you are working
on, you give yourself the opportunity to test drive the work with audiences
that represent a microcosm of the audience who will be reading the article
or chapter.
For the purpose of this assignment, you will develop your conference
paper into a 15-20 page article manuscript. Use the instructor's feedback
on your Conference Paper, as well as your peers' feedback from the Roundtable
to guide your revisions. You may also choose a specific journal
you want to submit your work to; thus use the journal's submission guidelines
when compose your text.

Criteria
Logistics:
- See
lengths, due dates, and point values above
In addition
to the general evaluation
criteria, the instructor will be looking for evidence of...
- a sense
of audiencedo you understand the range of your audience–from
novices to experts, from practitioners to theorists?
- an informed
understanding of rhetorical studies and composition studies. Does your
inquiry demonstrate an understanding of the chosen issue and its relevance
to these other two disciplines?
- an argument
that engages with these specific fields of study
- an ability
to engage in a meta-discourse about rhetorical theory and the teaching
of writing
- appropriate
use of conventions, including MLA, APA, or an appropriate citation formatting

|
|