From
the Preface:
“Mathematics in nature:
this book grew out of a course of the same name, with the rather
long subtitle “the beauty of nature as revealed by mathematics
and the beauty of mathematics as revealed in nature.” That course
in turn grew out of an awakened awareness of both such facets of
nature, even in a suburban environment, enhanced by occasional
trips to National and State Parks armed with binoculars and camera.
I decided that it might be fun to develop a course that included some of
the mathematics that lies behind some of the phenomena we
encounter in the natural world around us…
…I wanted to limit
the topics covered to those objects that could be seen with the
naked eye by anyone who takes their eyes outside; there are many
books written on the mathematical principles behind phenomena that
take place at the microscopic and submicroscopic levels, and also
from planetary to galactic scales. But leaves, trees, spider webs,
bubbles, waves, clouds, rainbows…these are elements of the stuff
we can easily see. The length scales extend roughly from 0.1 mm
(the thickness of a human hair or the size of some ice crystals
and diatoms) to almost 1000 km (large storm systems), a factor
of about 10^10; the timescales of the phenomena we seek to describe
range from a fraction of a second (the period of some ripples on
a puddle) through the order of a day (tidal periods) to the time
a tree takes to mature (perhaps thirty years in some cases), corresponding
to a factor of about 108 or 109. Of course,
in all likelihood we would not be around to see a sequoia tree
reach maturity (!), so I have drawn the line somewhat arbitrarily
at thirty years, but not in order to suggest that we stand around
and “watch trees grow.
Many patterns are
readily identified in nature. A visit to the zoo reminds us, no
doubt unnecessarily, that tigers and zebras have striped patterns;
leopards and hyenas have spotted patterns; giraffes are very blotchy
(as well as very tall), while butterflies and moths may possess
them all: spots, blotches, bands and stripes. Everyone notices
the wave patterns that move across oceans, lakes, ponds and puddles,
but fewer perhaps realize that waves move slowly across deserts
in the form of sand dunes. In the sky brightly colored circular
arcs -- rainbows -- beautify the sky after rain showers; from an
airplane or a high peak there may sometimes be seen “glories” --
small colored concentric rings surrounding the shadow of the airplane
or observer -- often called “The Specter of the Brocken” because
it is frequently observed by climbers on the Brocken peak in Germany.
On occasion circular and non-circular halos around and about the
sun can be produced by ice crystals; if still we look up, we may
sometimes observe parallel bands of cloud spreading across the
sky; these may be billows or lee waves depending on the mechanism
producing them -- the latter are sometimes called mountain waves
for this very reason. We may also see hexagonal-like clouds hanging
suspended from a blue ceiling: this is a manifestation of cellular
convection. Patterns of light scattering are exhibited in the pre-dawn
and twilight skies, in sunrise and sunset: blue sky and iridescent
clouds...
If we look down and
around in a well-tended garden, we may become aware (upon further
investigation) that arrangements of leaves, petals, seeds and florets
are intimately associated with spirals patterns, the related sequence
of numbers 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, ... and also
with an angle of about 137.5 degrees (or its complement,
222.5 degrees). Spirals in three dimensions (helices) with interesting
geometric properties plus striped patterns combine to make exquisite
sea shells; moving on to bigger plants, we may note that the heights
of trees are closely related to their diameters, following sound
engineering principles. Branching patterns in trees, leaves, river
networks, lungs and blood vessels exhibit similar (fractal-like)
features; there is an amazing unity (without uniformity) in nature.
There are also to be found some fascinating geometric properties
associated with mud cracks and patterns in the bark of trees.
Although it developed
out of a university course, this is not a textbook per se.
It will be very useful as such, I hope, but also it can be dipped
into at leisure; simple examples are scattered liberally thoughout
the book, and especially so in the early chapters. For whom then
is this book written? The answer is that it is for a mixture of
communities, academic and otherwise. Certainly I have in mind the
college population of undergraduate students in mathematics, science
and engineering (and their professors) who may be able to use it
as a supplement to their standard texts in various courses, particularly
those in mathematical modeling. The material covered here
is very broad in its scope, and I hope that it will be of considerable
interest to professors and students engaged in both these and interdisciplinary
courses. My further hope is that this material will appeal to high
school teachers and their students who may have the opportunity
for “mathematical enrichment” beyond the normal syllabus, if time
permits. Anyone interested in the beauty of nature, regardless
of mathematical background also (I trust) will enjoy much in this
book. Although the mathematical level ranges across a broad swathe,
from “applied arithmetic” to partial differential equations, there
is considerable non-mathematical discussion of the basic science
behind the equations which I hope will also appeal to many others
who might wish to ignore the equations (but not at their peril).
Thus those who have no formal mathematical background will find
much of value in the descriptive material contained here. The level
of mathematics used in this book varies from basic arithmetic,
geometry and trigonometry through calculus of a single variable,
(and a smidgin of linear algebra) to the occasional senior
or first year graduate-level topic in American universities and
colleges. A background in geometry, trigonometry and single-variable
calculus will suffice for most purposes; familiarity with the theory
of linear ordinary and partial differential equations is useful
but definitely not necessary in order to appreciate the contents
of this book. It should therefore be accessible almost in its entirety
to students of mathematics, science and engineering, the occasional
advanced topic notwithstanding.
One of the other major
reasons for writing this book is to bring together different strands
from the many fascinating books and scientific articles, both technical
and popular that I have collected, read and used, or just dipped
into over the last twenty five to thirty years. Some of the books
are out of print, though fortunately many are not. I have been
richly blessed and stimulated by the writings of many scientists
and mathematicians during this time, and in one sense therefore,
this book is the result of having carried out some “intellectual
janitorial activity”; a phrase that I encountered in Blair Kinsman's
book “Wind Waves” many years ago and have adopted as my own. My
hope is that this book will be a valuable resource for you, the
reader; it may provide details of previously unknown sources that
I encourage you to search out for yourself if time permits, but
failing that, may it be a useful introduction to some of the fascinating
and varied research that has been carried out by some very clever
people!
Continuing this personal
theme, I would like to share my philosophy for both writing about
and teaching applied mathematics. It is a simple one: (i) try to
understand the material to be presented at as many levels of description
as is reasonable, and (ii) attempt to communicate that understanding
with enthusiasm, gentleness and humor. Like most others in my profession,
I continue to be fascinated by the beauty, power and applicability
of mathematics, and try to induce that fascination in others (often
with mixed success in the classroom). Mathematics is a subject
that is misperceived, sadly, by many both inside and outside the
academic world. It is either thought to involve “doing long sums” or
to be a cold, austere subject of little interest in its own right
and no practical application whatsoever. These extremes could not
be further from the truth, and one of my goals in teaching mathematics
is to try and open students' minds to the above-mentioned triad
of beauty, power and applicability (even one out of three would
be valuable!). My goals are the same in writing. Nowadays a great
deal of what is taught in universities and colleges by applied
mathematicians comes under the general description mathematical
modeling. Mathematical modeling is as much “art” as “science”:
it requires the practitioner to (i) identify a so-called “real
world” problem (whatever the context may be), (ii) formulate it
in mathematical terms (the “word problem” so beloved of undergraduates),
(iii) solve the problem thus formulated (if possible; perhaps approximate
solutions will suffice, especially if the complete problem is intractable),
and (iv) interpret the solution in the context of the original
problem (i.e. what does this answer tell me? What does it really
mean? Is it consistent with what I know already about the problem?
What predictions can be made?). The formulation stage is often
the most difficult: it involves making judicious simplifications
to ``get a handle'' on the salient features of the problem. This
in turn provides the basis in principle for a more sophisticated
model, and so on. Whether the class is at an elementary, intermediate
or advanced level, it is important to convey aspects of the modeling
process that are relevant to a particular mathematical result or
technique that may be discussed in that class. Often this is most
easily accomplished by illustrating the result in the context of
a particular application. Consequently there are plenty of applications
in this book.
Some will wonder why
I have not included a chapter on “Fractals and Chaos in Nature” since
fractals, chaos and “complexity” are of such interest within the
scientific community. There are two basic reasons: (i) many others
have done an excellent job already on this topic, and (ii) it is
a huge subject that could occupy several volumes if carried out
properly. Fractal geometry has been characterized by some as the
only realistic way to mimic nature and describe it in mathematical
terms, and without wishing to question the foundations upon which
this book is based (non-fractal mathematics), there is a measure
of truth to that statement. But it has always been a strongly-held
opinion of mine that in order to gain the most understanding of
a physical phenomenon, it is necessary to view it with as many
complementary levels of description and explanation as possible; however,
description is not explanation. The “classical applied mathematics” utilized
in this book represents some of these levels, of course, and fractal
geometry represents another, very profound approach. Furthermore,
the latter is always “lurking in the background” in a book of this
type, and to this end I have provided a very brief and cursory
appendix on the topic of fractals and chaos, with some quotes from
experts in the field and references for further reading. Indeed,
the bibliography contains chapter numbers after each reference
to indicate which chapter(s) drew on this reference, either as
source material or as a valuable place to go deeper into a topic.
There are many valuable sources in the literature, and I will have
considered it a privilege if I can point readers to some of these
in their quest for a better appreciation of “mathematics in nature”.
Yet another approach to the scientific and mathematical description
of nature is via statistics and probability theory, and while those
subjects do not constitute a major thread in this book, they are
discussed in a little more detail in chapter 1…”
|